Skip to content →

Author: lievenlb

my temporary geek code

Published March 15, 2004 by lievenlb

I
haven’t mastered by far all nuances of this fine device yet, but here
it is : a first approximation to my geek
code

—–BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK—–
Version:
3.1
GM d- s: a+ C+ UB+ P+ L+ E- W++ N o? K- w– O? M+ V? PS+
PE- Y+ PGP t 5?
X- R- tv+ b+++ DI D? G e++++ h—- r+++ z?
——END GEEK CODE BLOCK——

No doubt I’ll post a
revision in a few weeks. If you do not feel like compiling your own
geek-code but rather want to find out what all this gibberish means,
there is the geek code decoder page to assist you.

Leave a Comment

ASCII math

Published March 14, 2004 by lievenlb

To
a large extent mathematics has to do with elaborate typography. Many
youngsters have been attracted over the centuries to maths because they
wanted to understand the meaning of these beautiful pages filled with
integrals, partial derivatives and other bizarre hieroglyphs. But now we
have come to the point that this obsession for symbols is working
against mathematics…
Have you ever wondered why there are so
few mathematics-pages on the net compared to computer-science pages
(apart from the fact that a lot more exiting things are happening in
web-technology these days than in mathematics), why forums dedicated to
math-problems never get off the ground (apart from boring housework
sites) or why it is so seldom that you discuss serious math with
colleagues or students via emails (apart from the fact that more and
more mathematicians seem to turn off their sharing mode) ???
One of the reasons might be that our default way of writing and
communicating math (LaTeX) is incompatible with either HTML or email
(and for those of you who think that LaTeX2HTML or
tth or similar programs offer an alternative, just
try to make an attractive looking website with them and prove me
wrong).
If we want mathematics to survive and flourish (and
whether you like it or not that may depend heavily on its
web-visibility) it is high time to develop some
ascii-math, that is, a way to write mathematical formulas in
plain typewriter symbols. This cannot be totally impossible as
programming languages are capable of defining a large number of
complicated objects with ascii and for those of you who discard the idea
on beauty-reasons, I never found a piece of code in a computer
book particularly ugly.
Of course I realise that not too many
people will be willing to make this paradigm-shift right now, but can we
at least ask of people introducing new symbols to add as an appendix to
their paper a suggestion for the transition to ascii-symbols for
those who value the net and/or sharing more than they do. Thank
you!

2 Comments

once more : synchronizing

Published March 12, 2004 by lievenlb


Carbon Copy Cloner is a tool to make a full backup
of your hard-disk on an external firewire disk or iPod. Here’s
how it sells itself

Have you ever wanted a simple, complete,
bootable backup of your hard drive? Have you ever wanted to upgrade to
a larger hard drive with minimal hassle and without reinstalling your
OS and all of your applications? Have you ever wanted to move your
entire Mac OS X installation to a new computer? Then CCC is the tool
for you! CCC makes these tasks simple by harnessing the Unix power
built into Mac OS X. In addition to the features that CCC has provided
in the past, version 2 offers synchronization of the source and target
as well as scheduled backup tasks.

I didn’t try it out yet
but was interested in the final sentence and scrolling down the page I
discovered that the synchronisation is done using Dan Kogai’s psync program, which does not seem to work under
10.3 but has on the page a patch to this. Rather than using the
psync-page to install it, one can use the unoffical psync for Panther dmg-file from the
Carbon Copy Cloner-page. It installs without a problem and to
learn how to use it, there is a manual page. Here is what I do when I want to
synchronize my Documents-folder on iMacLieven to the
backup-machine tweedledee over the Airport-network 

psync
/Network/iMacLieven/lieven/Documents /Users/lieven/docsLieven

Watching the packet-flow on the Activity Monitor it seems to be
slightly quicker than the rsync tool. But most of all : it seems
to do a much better job. When I compared the end-result of the
synchronising session with rsync to that of psync I was
surprised to find a 20 Mb difference (on an original .5 Gb Folder) in
psync‘s favour! But even psync seems to have dropped 0.6
Mb in the process…

Leave a Comment